The Hunger Games:
Catching Fire (2013): Another View
Dir. Francis Lawrence
The first instalment of this franchise was entertaining and
placed us within a dystopian future whereby the national sport is a
gladiatorial exercise for survival called the Hunger Games. Further, the social
classes are segregated into ‘Districts’ and a male and female contestants are
picked from each of the 12. This sense of oppression and inequality created
another political satire fibre within the narrative.
After Lawrence’s Katniss offered herself in place of her
younger sister to participate in the first film and then won with her
counterpart Peeta (Joel Hutcherson) which was highly irregular and now we have
Catching Fire.
We are placed soon after the Games have finished and see how
the victors visit each District and praise the dead participants. However
revolution is occurring against Panem and hope is slowly rising. President Snow
(played by the low pitched menace Donald Sutherland) and new character Plutarch
(Again played by a malevolent PSH) both explain how Katniss has become a newly
found symbol of hope for Panem and must be eradicated but not in the sense of
imposing martyrdom. What is then decided is to celebrate the new Hunger Games
by bringing back selected previous winners of the tournament to participate in
an ultimate challenge.
The political and media satire become more apparent as the
narrative progresses with Ceaser (Stanley Tucci) the main televised speaker for
the tournament and its rumour mill. With multiple quotes and scenarios being
exposed that replicate the modern day but in a more extravagant and vivid
manner. These moments are manipulated by Katniss and Peeta who both attempt to
stop this abnormal year of Games after they believed when they won the
traumatic Games that would be it.
Firstly, what makes this film so much better than the
previous picture is that even with the political satire, the narrative started
to show more complex elements to it with the ‘love triangle’ between Katniss,
Peeta and Gale (Liam Hemsworth) starting to show more ambiguity. Further, the a
grittier narrative has started to materialise with the Capitol’s actions start
becoming more aggressive with storm troopers showing violent actions toward
rebellious individuals.
So even with a fan base from the books and a cinematic
adolescent audience, the film takes courage in the fact it deals with more
grown up problems and narrative strings that adults have more possibilities of
dissecting through the satirical and realistic subject matter.
Finally, Jennifer Lawrence absolutely dominates the screen
with her ferocious and manipulative persona, which is incredibly displayed in
the final sequence. She puts a performance of the highest quality, even more so
than in Silver Linings and indeed this performance does create real promise for
her upcoming parts in Days of Future Past and American Hustle. With her
supremacy on screen it takes nothing away from the supporting cast but her
quality certain appears to raise everyone else’s game and especially solidify
the quality of this film.
This assembly of elements from political satire to
Jennifer Lawrence’s presence on screen, certainly places Catching Fire as a
prime example of a brilliant ‘Bridge’ film, along with the like Two Towers and
The Dark Knight but of course not exactly on that level, mainly to explain
‘bridge’ film predecessors. Even though the next book has been segmented into
two films, the franchise is setting up for an awkward quadrilogy but I’m sure
if JL maintains this kind of quality and Francis Lawrence keeps up his end of
the bargain being at the directorial helm, I’m certain this franchise will
flourish cinematically and financially.
Comments
Post a Comment