Collateral Beauty (2016)
Collateral Beauty (2016)
Not sure
where to start, apart from the fact that this film is terrible – literally
terrible. Maybe not Battlefield Earth
standard of awful but it is certainly up there. The Christmas season has always
been affiliated with a plethora of appalling films - New Year’s Eve and Dirty
Grandpa spring to mind. Collateral
Beauty is no different. It begins with Will Smith’s character Howard suffering
the trauma of losing his infant child. Unable to cope with the loss, Howard
becomes a recluse. As his company starts to decay in his absence, his ‘friends’
played by Ed Norton, Kate Winslet and Michael Pena become concerned over their
company assets. So they decide to follow Howard, revealing he has sent letters
to the three “abstractions” – yes, just go with it – love, death and time. And
in their kindness and friendship, they call upon failing actors, most notably played
by Helen Mirren, to impersonate these abstractions and meet Howard, to then
have that meeting recorded with the actors edited out to substantiate the claim
that Howard is unfit to run the company. The reason that sounds long winded –
is because it is.
However, as
the film was progressing I was thinking that yes this was rubbish, but maybe it
would stay true to its boldness of having friends manipulating a traumatized
father for financial gain. And while it would still be rubbish, it would be
ever so slightly commendable in a laughable kind of way. Then the dual twists
happens. I was surprised the audience didn’t collectively raise a synchronised
hand gesture toward the screen. I left feeling like the philosophy post
graduate who wrote this film was trying to prove that they were the smartest
person in the auditorium.
Collateral Beauty is a mess and is simply a film for
agnostic moviegoers who are still caught up in festive cheer.
Comments
Post a Comment